Driving down Portland Place, 1835

September 29, 2014 at 10:25 am (books, carriages & transport, diaries, goslings and sharpe, history, london's landscape) (, , , )


This past week has been FILLED with letters (thank you Anna!), some of which have given the harrowing details of the last illness of William Gosling, senior partner in the banking firm Goslings and Sharpe – and my Mary’s father. Mary lost two family members in January 1834 – her brother William also died (of scarlet fever).

But it is from a diary, written by a young girl who, though ever so nominally ‘related’ to the Smiths and Goslings, probably never met any of them. The connection is Mrs Thomas Smith – sister-in-law of Joshua Smith, she was Great Aunt to Emma and Charles Smith; and through her own sister Juliana (née Mackworth Praed), aunt to the diarist Emily Shore and her sisters, as well as Winthrop Mackworth Praed.

But I digress…

Anna Leszkiewicz’s delightful review @ Rookie of “The Journal of Emily Shore”

It is May 20, 1835 – and Emily Shore and her mother have been invited to visit a London family. Oh, Emily has some very choice words to say about the fog, smog, smoke of London. The country-girl was unimpressed.

So how wonderful to then read what DID impress her: Portland Place!

But let’s first put Emily on the road :

We avoided the City altogether, going by the New Road, through Regent’s Park. I was altogether disappointed in the Park. I had expected at least to see fine timber. No such thing. The horrid atmosphere of London checks all vegetation. As far as I could see, there was not a tree in Regent’s Park to compare with the greater part of those in Whitewood. Besides, the sky is smoky and dingy, there is not freshness in the air, nor the bloom of spring everywhere, as in the country. It has also a formal look; it is intersected with wide public roads, which are inclosed by hedges or railings. These roads were full of carriages, cabs, horsemen, and pedestrians, which are supposed to give so much liveliness to the scene; so they do, but I like a retired, unfrequented park much better.

nos-5-6PPOn leaving Regent’s Park we entered Portland place. Here I was much struck with the grandeur of the buildings, surpassing anything I ever saw in the shape of private houses. If London had all been like this, it would have been a magnificent city. But I  believe not many parts are so noble as this.

To remind Two Teens in the Time of Austen readers, the Goslings lived at No. 5 Portland Place, and the Smiths were next door, at No. 6 — No. 5 is the address in the middle, with the “longest” yard and “shortest” house (click to enlarge map), and at the right (with the white pilasters) in the photo below, which looks UP the street from Langham Place; Regents Park is at the opposite end.

portland place

EXTRAS:

Advertisements

3 Comments

  1. EW said,

    I’m fascinated by the renumbering of properties in Portland Place and also by the plan detail you include above. Can you tell me where you sourced that, please?

  2. Janeite Kelly said,

    Hi, EW – The map with the well-detailed Portland Place numbering is the Richard HORWOOD map (in this instance, the series from the 1790s). I had always wondered whether the Smiths (at No. 6) and the Goslings (at No. 5) were next-door-neighbors – or if the addresses were one side odd numbers and the opposite side all evens numbers. A blog reader found the Horwood map – and we could then SEE that they were indeed neighboring addresses. The scale is 26 inches to the mile.

    Another series – of books this time – which are of use, and have excellently-detailed maps, are found in the Survey of London. One volume, with a map of Great George Street (where the JOSHUA SMITHS lived while he was in Parliament), was used in the blog post https://smithandgosling.wordpress.com/2014/07/16/great-george-st-westminster/

    This series of books are found online at the University of Toronto.

    As to the re-numbering… I have looked at the correspondence and later life of the Smiths & Goslings. No. 5 (as I continue to call it) wasn’t sold out of the family until the 1920s. The Robert Goslings can be found continually inhabiting the address, through various news-pieces and directories. They didn’t _move_ the street was renumbered. Knowing the Smith address – and with the help of the map, knowing No. 6 was next door – the new number for the Smiths could be deduced.

    Kelly

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: